English
Speed up communications standards development
Mike Woodward, The MathWorks
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
Nov 03, 2005 (5:00 AM)
CommsDesign
Developing communications standards is an increasingly difficult task. Due to the cost, complexity and specialized knowledge needed, today's standards are usually developed using a consortium approach, one that often adds to development problems. Driven by several factors, this approach to standards development has been used since the late 1980s. Complexity is a key factor, both at the system and algorithm levels.
Each new generation of standards is at least an order of magnitude more complex than its predecessor. As a result, the cost of developing standards has increased, in most cases, beyond the level that an individual company would be comfortable shouldering. The growing size and complexity of standards also means that more companies are needed to provide the specialized skills required. Because international markets are now a target of most standards, involving companies from different countries helps with regulatory and market acceptance.
By its very nature, standards development requires a nimble approach; every time the standard consortium adopts a change, models must be updated and re-run. More partners in the consortium can mean more changes.
The traditional approach to standards development, using C models, is ill-suited for this kind of rapid and iterative development. Model-based design provides an alternative method of modeling communications standards with hierarchical, block-based models that drastically reduces the time required to make modifications.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
Related Articles
- How to use snakes to speed up software without slowing down the time-to-market?
- Choosing the right A/D converter architecture and IP to meet the latest high speed wireless standards
- Speed up machine-to-machine networking with UDP
- FPGA debugging techniques to speed up pre-silicon validation
- Virtual prototypes speed wireless development
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)