How to make your asymmetric multiprocessor design OS and CPU independent
Dec 21 2005 (1:42 AM), Embedded.com
Even as semiconductor companies tend toward multiprocessing solutions in many network as well as embedded consumer and mobile designs, the RTOSes and development tools are still rushing to catch up with the shift.
Most multiprocessing-capable operating systems support one type of processor at a time and are often limited to symmetric multiprocessing (SMP). While SMP provides a relatively straightforward path from single processing, it can only be used for homogeneous configurations with shared resources.
But most embedded applications are at least partially asymmetric in nature. And asymmetric multiprocessor (AMP) systems require multiple instantiations of the same or different operating systems running on different cores.
In a system with different OSes or a heterogeneous multicore system, implementing a common middleware structure to manage communications between the processors comes down to bridging between the different OSes and/or processor types.
Many of the first generation multiprocessor designs currently in consumer embedded systems, fortunately, are not complicated and it has been possible to incorporate simple, often hand-coded, communications mechanisms to synchronize operation. But such designs will not scale well and are not portable to the next generation of three, four, six and eight core configurations that are emerging.
What is needed is a way to organize all the system software modules necessary for inter-core communications into a framework transparent to the operating system or platform (hardware and logical).
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related Articles
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)
- PCIe error logging and handling on a typical SoC