Unite algorithm and hardware design flows
Past attempts to bridge between the DSP design domain and physical implementations fell short, but the new "DSP synthesis" approach creates a truly integrated design flow.
By Chris Eddington, Senior Technical Marketing Manager, Synplicity
Jul 24 2006 (14:00 PM), Courtesy of DSP DesignLine
Many high-performance signal processing products are now being implemented in field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). FPGAs can offer an order of magnitude performance increase over standard DSP chips, making programmable logic a natural choice for high-performance DSP electronics.
There are typically two groups involved in the design and realization of DSP algorithms in an FPGA: DSP architects and hardware design engineers. Unfortunately, there is a "wall of abstraction" between the architects who formulate the algorithms and the design engineers who are charged with their physical implementation (Figure 1).
(Click this image to view a larger version)
1. A wall of abstraction separates DSP architects and hardware design engineers
This article reviews past attempts to build a bridge between the DSP design domain and physical implementations. Also discussed are the ways in which each of these conventional approaches falls short. Next, we introduce a new DSP design methodology—true DSP synthesis—which integrates into existing design flows without any disruption. This solution bridges the gap between the algorithmic and implementation domains by automating the processes of system-level optimization and implementation-level mapping.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related Articles
- Hybrid Hardware Architecture for Low Complexity Motion Estimation Algorithm
- Fit the hardware to the algorithm with SystemC models
- From a Lossless (~1.5:1) Compression Algorithm for Llama2 7B Weights to Variable Precision, Variable Range, Compressed Numeric Data Types for CNNs and LLMs
- Writing a modular Audio Post Processing DSP algorithm
- The Challenge of Automotive Hardware Security Deployment
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)