Employ dynamic power reduction in an ASIC
By Somnath Viswanath, inSilica Inc
(09/14/07, 01:30:00 AM EDT), Embedded Systems Design
Increasing battery life without compromising performance and functionality is a prime concern for the handheld market. The form-factor and economics of this market also demand an ever increasing level of integration for these devices. Each generation of handheld devices sets more aggressive battery-life goals, making power reduction an important consideration for the system designer.
To achieve this objective, system architects must incorporate power-saving methods into all aspects of device implementation. Monitoring and analyzing patterns of application use reveals opportunities to optimize power. These opportunities should be recorded in a power-optimization specification that guides the selection of power-reduction techniques for each component in the system. Techniques to lower power can be applied to both software and hardware components.
A handheld device consists of a display unit, keyboard, and audio I/O, all of which are controlled by a system-on-chip (SoC) and associated peripheral chips. Power is supplied by a rechargeable battery. A typical SoC consists of two kinds of intellectual property (IP) blocks:
- Standard third-party IP blocks (for example, an embedded processor)
- Customer-specific IP (CS-IP)
When your team hands off your SoC design to the ASIC designer, you challenge the ASIC designer to meet power-reduction targets by implementing multiple power-saving techniques to the CS-IP blocks. A combination of time-to-market pressure and functional integration requirements conspire to make the ASIC designer rely heavily on proven IP to implement an SoC for the handheld market. Product differentiation is achieved by integrating standard third-party IP with CS-IP to compete in an increasingly crowded and converged handheld device market. The proprietary CS-IP is designed by IP groups whose primary focus is on functionality rather than power.
Hence, an ASIC designer integrating a CS-IP block doesn't have the requisite knowledge of its micro-architecture nor details of its verification environment. Moreover, an ASIC designer working for an ASIC vendor that's integrating the SoC is often supplied the CS-IP as a hard-macro with an encrypted simulation model, further limiting the options to modify its implementation.
In spite of these challenges, an ASIC designer can use several techniques to reduce dynamic power consumption of CS-IP blocks in an SoC. Some of these techniques don't require extensive modifications to the CS-IP, which is particularly advantageous for those CS-IP that are supplied in a format that precludes synthesis or remapping of gates.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Related Articles
- Shift Power Reduction Methods and Effectiveness for Testability in ASIC
- Implementing Power Management IP for Dynamic and Static Power Reduction in Configurable Microprocessors using the Galaxy Design Platform at 130nm
- Analog and Power Management Trends in ASIC and SoC Designs
- SamurAI: a 1.7MOPS-36GOPS Adaptive Versatile IoT Node with 15,000x Peak-to- Idle Power Reduction, 207ns Wake-up Time and 1.3TOPS/W ML Efficiency
- FinFET impact on dynamic power
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)