Who doesn't need Ethernet timestamps?
Embedded.com (03/04/09, 12:00:00 AM EST)
IEEE 1588 has matured from its humble beginning in 2002 as a mechanism to synchronize Ethernet-connected test equipment into a protocol that is widely used on many of the circuit boards it was originally designed to test.
In fact, IEEE 1588 is the root of new timestamping for Industrial Ethernet protocols such as PROFINET, CIP SYNC, IEEE 802.1AS audio video bridging, the LXI consortium for the Test & Measurement industry, ITU G.8261 for telecommunications, IEC 81650 and numerous proprietary solutions which synchronize disparate Ethernet-networked clocks.
As defined by the IEEE 1588 committee, its precision time protocol (PTP) supports:
- High clock synchronization accuracy typically better than a microsecond
- Fast synchronization of networked clocks in typically fewer than 20 clock cycles
- Minimal compute and network footprint
- Synchronization of heterogeneous clocks with varying accuracy, resolution, drift and stability characteristics
- Easy configuration and operation by non-expert users for low cost and administrative setup
But many embedded applications already benefit from Ethernet timestamp protocols and can only be expected to proliferate further in the future with the availability of Version 2.0.
Factory and process automation applications use them it to synchronize sensors and actuators over single-wire distributed network to control automated assembly processes and time-based motion control.
Aerospace applications use them to synchronize vehicle controls. Power line management applications synchronize across large-scale distributed power grid for smooth power transfer.
Networking and telecommunications use them to lower the cost of high-precision time synchronization between communicating nodes. Professional and consumer multimedia applications are starting to use them to ensure customers don't hear or see effects of packet delay or loss from Ethernet-connected speakers and monitors.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Related Articles
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- Smart Tracking of SoC Verification Progress Using Synopsys' Hierarchical Verification Plan (HVP)
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Synthesis Methodology & Netlist Qualification