English
NVM OTP NeoBit in GLOBALFOUNDRIES (350nm, 250nm, 180nm, 160nm, 150nm, 130nm, 110nm, 65nm, 55nm)
e-MMC vs. NAND with built-in ECC
Doug Wong, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
8/18/2011 9:44 AM EDT
As NAND flash continues to increase in density and decrease in cost per gigabyte, it has enabled more cost-effective storage. This benefits a wide (and constantly growing) range of digital consumer products. Selecting the most appropriate high performance NAND architecture for any given application is of increasing importance as the ECC requirements for NAND continue to increase.
This article will explore the attributes of and differences between e-MMC and NAND with built-in ECC (such as Toshiba’s SmartNANDTM) – as well as go into detail about the applications that are best suited for each.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
|
||||||
Related Articles
- Picking the right built-in self-test strategy for your embedded ASIC
- Built-In DMA Engines Unleash Power of PCI Express Switches
- A comparison of SRAM vs quantum-derived semiconductor PUFs
- PCIe 5.0 vs. Emerging Protocol Standards - Will PCIe 5.0 Become Ubiquitous in Tomorrow's SoCs?
- Transactor vs CPU in SoC Verification
New Articles
- Understanding MACsec and Its Integration
- Discover new Tessent UltraSight-V from Siemens EDA, and accelerate your RISC-V development.
- The Critical Factors of a High-performance Audio Codec - What Chip Designers Need to Know
- Density Management in Analog Layout Design: Addressing Issues and Ensuring Consistency
- Nexus: A Lightweight and Scalable Multi-Agent Framework for Complex Tasks Automation