Assessing patent value -- Hardware inventions
Rajeev Gupta & JP Long (Finnegan)
embedded.com (August 31, 2015)
Determining the value of a patent or a patent portfolio is no easy task. This is especially true for the semiconductor industry, where a single infringing product may be covered by hundreds—if not thousands—of other patents. Adding to this complexity, new developments in U.S. patent damages law have the potential to alter the value of semiconductor patents significantly. Recent court decisions have increasingly emphasized the importance of the smallest salable patent-practicing unit (“SSPPU”) in assessing damages for infringement. In this article, we briefly discuss how semiconductor device manufacturers might be able to take advantage of this trend to maximize the value of their own patents and to minimize their infringement liability. In a subsequent article, we will look at factors affecting the value of software inventions.
In Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Sys., Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently underscored the following principles of patent valuation:
Where the entire value of a machine as a marketable article is properly and legally attributable to the patented feature, the damages owed to the patentee may be calculated by reference to that value. Where it is not, however, courts must insist on a more realistic starting point for the royalty calculations by juries—often, the [SSPPU] and, at times, even less
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related Articles
- The Challenge of Automotive Hardware Security Deployment
- Fmax Margin/Value Improvement for Memory Block During ECO Stage
- How Efinix is Conquering the Hurdle of Hardware Acceleration for Devices at the Edge
- Why Hardware Root of Trust Needs Anti-Tampering Design
- Securing the IC Supply Chain - Integrating PUF-Based hardware security
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)