English
Formal property verification: A tale of two methods
David Vincenzoni, STMicroelectronics
EDN (January 15, 2018)
The Formal Property Verification (FPV) methodology often gets used in the last step of verification flow, after much time spent building a complex random constrained UVM (Universal Verification Methodology) environment where some corner cases are still not covered.
Other times, FPV is used when a silicon bug is found that was not raised during the dynamic verification phase.
In a wisely applied verification flow, FPV should be used in the first phase, as soon as the RTL (Register Transfer Logic) code is available.
Here we look at two examples of verification flow:
- A digital block verified through a UVM test bench
- Then, first verified using FPV flow.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
|
||||||
Related Articles
New Articles
- RISC-V in 2025: Progress, Challenges,and What's Next for Automotive & OpenHardware
- Understanding MACsec and Its Integration
- Discover new Tessent UltraSight-V from Siemens EDA, and accelerate your RISC-V development.
- The Critical Factors of a High-performance Audio Codec - What Chip Designers Need to Know
- Density Management in Analog Layout Design: Addressing Issues and Ensuring Consistency
Most Popular
- RISC-V in 2025: Progress, Challenges,and What's Next for Automotive & OpenHardware
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- A Heuristic Approach to Fix Design Rule Check (DRC) Violations in ASIC Designs @7nm FinFET Technology