Economics of the FPGA
By Efinix, Inc.
EETimes (October 11, 2021)
Today’s world is full of high-tech gadgets with increasingly complex functionality and capabilities that were historically the stuff of science fiction. When we use our connected devices and snap high-definition photos with our “supercomputer” cellphones, few of us give a thought to the underlying technology. Fewer still are aware of the increasing tension being created by physical and market dynamics within each device that makes every successive generation incrementally more difficult to make and to justify.
The relentless pursuit of small devices with lower power and more capability drives the need for increased integration. This, in turn, requires smaller silicon geometries wherein designers are required to adopt 28-nm, 16-nm, 12-nm, 7-nm, 5-nm processes and beyond. With every reduction in silicon process geometry comes a nonlinear increase in design and manufacturing cost. Designing in smaller geometries requires increasingly rare expertise, longer design times, increased cost of design tools, and increased program risk.
These exponentially increasing design costs must be amortized over the volume of devices shipped during the project’s lifespan. Unfortunately, as global competition increases, the diversity of application functionality increases and product life spans reduce. Fewer designs can justify the expense of custom silicon and fewer companies can attract the increasingly rare talent to design it.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Related Articles
- FPGA comes back into its own as edge computing and AI catch fire
- Why Transceiver-Rich FPGAs Are Suitable for Vehicle Infotainment System Designs
- The rise of FPGA technology in High-Performance Computing
- How Efinix is Conquering the Hurdle of Hardware Acceleration for Devices at the Edge
- Understanding Interface Analog-to-Digital Converters (ADCs) with DataStorm DAQ FPGA
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)