IP promise still can be kept
![]() |
IP promise still can be kept
By Brian Fuller, EE Times
June 5, 2003 (10:09 a.m. EST)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20030605S0022
ANAHEIM, Calif. The original promise of the IP methodology was broken sometime ago, but the industry still needs to keep the promise, a panel agreed here Wednesday (June 4) at the Design Automation Conference. "Thet original promise of IP was that you could use it as a virtual component. Yes, it's been a largely broken promise. However that is still what the IP industry should aspire to do," said Craig Lytle vice president of the IP business unit at Altera Corp. (San Jose, Calif). The panel, sponsored by VSI Alliance and moderated by EE Times senior editor Ron Wilson, shot holes through the notion that the IP business itself is dead. Bart De Loore, general manager of reuse technology at Philips, said his company has 450 cores from 20 internal and external providers. "Most are assumed for design re-use. Design for reuse has been elevated to a company policy and it's being used all over the place," he said. But where perhaps th e under-appreciated model starts to have difficulty is in the area of optimization. Some panelists insisted that no matter how rock solid a core may be, customer usually wants to optimize it for their designs. Among other things this can lead to costly continued maintenance with the customer. Bernie Rosenthal, senior vice president of marketing and sales for Tensilica Inc., noted that his company has automated the tool chain "to, in effect, constrain the user to valid states of IP." Lytle said Altera has sold more 13,000, and of those 250-300 have been customization projects. "We'll do them ourselves and optimize the RTL for them," he said. Ultimately you have use the IP in some sort of differentiated type of way," said Ronnie Vasishta, vice president of technology marketing and Coreware at LSI Logic. "That's where a lot of initial IP companies failed to realize. They said 'well, here's the RTL. Now we're done." Kurt Wolf, director of library management at TSMC, cautioned about an oversimp listic and over-demanding view of IP providers. Too many people still think acquiring an IP core is like shopping for food at a grocery store "and it's magically going to work. It doesn't work that way. It won't and it never has. Yeah, there's science to what we're doing but there's also art." Wolf said everybody in the industry needs to be "healthy" for the whole SOC industry to thrive. "You have to be careful what you wish for in terms of beating up your IP providers for more and more at less and less cost," he said.
Related Articles
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
- CANsec: Security for the Third Generation of the CAN Bus
- How control electronics can help scale quantum computers
- Neural Networks Can Help Keep Connected Vehicles Secure
- How Low Can You Go? Pushing the Limits of Transistors - Deep Low Voltage Enablement of Embedded Memories and Logic Libraries to Achieve Extreme Low Power
New Articles
- Why RISC-V is a viable option for safety-critical applications
- Dimensioning in 3D space: Object Volumetric Measurement by Leveraging Depth Camera-based Reconstruction on NVIDIA Edge devices
- What is JESD204B? Quick summary of the standard
- Post-Quantum Cryptography - Securing Semiconductors in a Post-Quantum World
- Analysis and Summary on Clock Generator Circuits and PLL Design
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- Method for Booting ARM Based Multi-Core SoCs
- An Outline of the Semiconductor Chip Design Flow
![]() |
E-mail This Article | ![]() |
![]() |
Printer-Friendly Page |