English
Court broadens IP protections
Warren S. Heit
(11/21/2005 10:00 AM EST)
EE Times
A Silicon Valley dispute festering in the courts since 1999 will likely have far-reaching impact on how chip designers protect their intellectual property. A decision in September by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Altera Corp. v. Clear Logic Inc. has given the little-used Semiconductor Chip Protection Act (sometimes called the SCPA or the "Mask Works Act") a new lease on life. The decision lets designers invoke SCPA to protect their designs at a higher, more architectural level, not merely at the lower, transistor level.
Since a chip's architecture-its functional blocks and their layout and interconnectivity-is a critical component of its design and the blueprint upon which the chip is built, designers dedicate enormous resources to its development.
Designers have relied almost exclusively on patents to protect innovations in a chip architecture. While a powerful form of IP protection, patenting takes a long time, averaging two to three years; can be prohibitively expensive, costing $10,000 to $50,000 or more; and often requires innovators to make concessions that narrow the claims and thus the scope of the protection.
(11/21/2005 10:00 AM EST)
EE Times
A Silicon Valley dispute festering in the courts since 1999 will likely have far-reaching impact on how chip designers protect their intellectual property. A decision in September by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Altera Corp. v. Clear Logic Inc. has given the little-used Semiconductor Chip Protection Act (sometimes called the SCPA or the "Mask Works Act") a new lease on life. The decision lets designers invoke SCPA to protect their designs at a higher, more architectural level, not merely at the lower, transistor level.
Since a chip's architecture-its functional blocks and their layout and interconnectivity-is a critical component of its design and the blueprint upon which the chip is built, designers dedicate enormous resources to its development.
Designers have relied almost exclusively on patents to protect innovations in a chip architecture. While a powerful form of IP protection, patenting takes a long time, averaging two to three years; can be prohibitively expensive, costing $10,000 to $50,000 or more; and often requires innovators to make concessions that narrow the claims and thus the scope of the protection.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
- German Court Fines Netflix €7.05 Million for Continued Infringement of Broadcom HEVC Patent
- US Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit Confirms Finding that Apple Infringes WiLAN Patents
- Taiwan's Intellectual Property and Commercial Court Announced Its Ruling on UMC and Other Defendants with Respect to Micron Case
- Weebit Nano broadens its technology portfolio to further bolster its ReRAM capability and expand commercialisation opportunities
- SmartDV Broadens Support for Arm AMBA Protocol with Verification IP Solutions for AMBA CHI, CXS, LPI
Breaking News
- HPC customer engages Sondrel for high end chip design
- Ubitium Debuts First Universal RISC-V Processor to Enable AI at No Additional Cost, as It Raises $3.7M
- TSMC drives A16, 3D process technology
- Frontgrade Gaisler Unveils GR716B, a New Standard in Space-Grade Microcontrollers
- Blueshift Memory launches BlueFive processor, accelerating computation by up to 50 times and saving up to 65% energy
Most Popular
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
- Eliyan Ports Industry's Highest Performing PHY to Samsung Foundry SF4X Process Node, Achieving up to 40 Gbps Bandwidth at Unprecedented Power Levels with UCIe-Compliant Chiplet Interconnect Technology
- TSMC drives A16, 3D process technology
- CXL Fabless Startup Panmnesia Secures Over $60M in Series A Funding, Aiming to Lead the CXL Switch Silicon Chip and CXL IP
- Blueshift Memory launches BlueFive processor, accelerating computation by up to 50 times and saving up to 65% energy