Letter to the editor: Patents a sore spot (Tuan Pham, EM Microelectronic Marin)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves -- or others -- to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
Just reading your article brings me to a subject that annoys almost small semiconductor firms: Nowaday, the equipment vendors sell their tools without transferring to the buyer the right to use the process.
Normally a tool is "qualified" using a "standard process" from the supplier with minor modification. But there is a problem that arises since a lot of processes, chemistries have been patented and claims in the patents are often overlapped each other. This is extremely difficult to know exactly what is free of infringement of not.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
- Letter to the editor: Darwin's theory on IP (Kalar Rajendiran, eSilicon)
- Letter to the editor: MIPS talks IP
- Letter to the editor: IP, cars share common ground (C. Paul Slaby, Kaben Wireless Silicon)
- Letter to the editor: IP worth its weight (Jim Gobes, CEO, Intrinsix)
- Letter to the editor: Turley speaks out (Patriot Scientific)
Breaking News
- Jury is out in the Arm vs Qualcomm trial
- Ceva Seeks To Exploit Synergies in Portfolio with Nano NPU
- Synopsys Responds to U.K. Competition and Markets Authority's Phase 1 Announcement Regarding Ansys Acquisition
- Alphawave Semi Scales UCIe™ to 64 Gbps Enabling >20 Tbps/mm Bandwidth Density for Die-to-Die Chiplet Connectivity
- RaiderChip Hardware NPU adds Falcon-3 LLM to its supported AI models