Letter to the editor: IP pros, cons (Jonah Probell)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
I did engineering for Lexra, founded Ultra Data and ultimately sold its video processor technology to a chip company, did sales for ARC, and am about to join a fourth semi IP company. I've studied the processor IP core business model in perhaps as much depth as anybody.
I believe that the principles of third party IP licensing are sound. Where functions are highly standardized (e.g. SONET, 802.11, DDR DRAM, USB, MPEG, DVB, Windows) semiconductor makers derive no differentiation advantage from implementing such IP. Therefore, it is most efficient for the industry if semiconductor makers focus their resources on developing technologies from which they can derive a competitive advantage and license IP from companies that can spread the cost of implementing standards across multiple semiconductor vendors.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
- NXP CoolFlux BSP's 12-bit computation has pros and cons for low-power baseband
- Letter to the editor: Darwin's theory on IP (Kalar Rajendiran, eSilicon)
- Letter to the editor: MIPS talks IP
- Letter to the editor: IP, cars share common ground (C. Paul Slaby, Kaben Wireless Silicon)
- Letter to the editor: IP worth its weight (Jim Gobes, CEO, Intrinsix)
Breaking News
- Jury is out in the Arm vs Qualcomm trial
- Ceva Seeks To Exploit Synergies in Portfolio with Nano NPU
- Synopsys Responds to U.K. Competition and Markets Authority's Phase 1 Announcement Regarding Ansys Acquisition
- Alphawave Semi Scales UCIe™ to 64 Gbps Enabling >20 Tbps/mm Bandwidth Density for Die-to-Die Chiplet Connectivity
- RaiderChip Hardware NPU adds Falcon-3 LLM to its supported AI models