Letter to the editor: DSPs for IP (Shaul Berger)
I received a plethora of e-mails regarding my recent article, entitled "Semi IP sector is a lost cause"
Then, I asked for the IP vendors themselves to respond to a set of questions. Here's one letter to the editor:
Editor,
We met in the past and I am (at least I claim to be objective) on this topic, being there and have done it several times. I think you are right on the money and it is not pleasant for companies trying to make money selling IP, to face the reality. The reality is that even many of the top 10 vendors hardly make money and by financial standards (EPS) they are not investor quality grade. I am not expert on the whole IP space but I know very well the DSP IP domain.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
Related News
- Letter to the editor: Darwin's theory on IP (Kalar Rajendiran, eSilicon)
- Letter to the editor: MIPS talks IP
- Letter to the editor: IP, cars share common ground (C. Paul Slaby, Kaben Wireless Silicon)
- Letter to the editor: IP worth its weight (Jim Gobes, CEO, Intrinsix)
- Letter to the editor: Turley speaks out (Patriot Scientific)
Breaking News
- Jury is out in the Arm vs Qualcomm trial
- Ceva Seeks To Exploit Synergies in Portfolio with Nano NPU
- Synopsys Responds to U.K. Competition and Markets Authority's Phase 1 Announcement Regarding Ansys Acquisition
- Alphawave Semi Scales UCIe™ to 64 Gbps Enabling >20 Tbps/mm Bandwidth Density for Die-to-Die Chiplet Connectivity
- RaiderChip Hardware NPU adds Falcon-3 LLM to its supported AI models