English
7 µW always on Audio feature extraction with filter banks on TSMC 22nm uLL
Measuring Quality in Semiconductor IP
By Piyush Sancheti, Atrenta Inc
edadesignline.com (September 29, 2008)
Semiconductor IP reuse can yield a 2x improvement in design productivity for semiconductor companies. However, with these startling productivity gains come integration pain. Why? Semiconductor IP is essentially a black box for the SoC team that comes from various external sources, with varying and often unknown levels of quality and reusability. SoC designers must find a quality metric for semiconductor IP. If not, they may abandon its use.
Most semiconductor IP today is delivered as soft IP - register transfer level (RTL) or configurable generators that produce RTL. IP suppliers do ensure correct functional behavior. Often overlooked in this process is the communication of design intent and implementation feasibility, a task left for the IP consumer to deal with. A poorly designed IP can result in failures at the SoC level with timing, routing congestion, power, clock synchronization, test coverage, etc. Typically these issues will not be uncovered until after a significant engineering effort has been spent on integration of the IP into the SoC and subsequent implementation. The net result is expensive design iterations, project delays and potential silicon failure.
edadesignline.com (September 29, 2008)
Semiconductor IP reuse can yield a 2x improvement in design productivity for semiconductor companies. However, with these startling productivity gains come integration pain. Why? Semiconductor IP is essentially a black box for the SoC team that comes from various external sources, with varying and often unknown levels of quality and reusability. SoC designers must find a quality metric for semiconductor IP. If not, they may abandon its use.
Most semiconductor IP today is delivered as soft IP - register transfer level (RTL) or configurable generators that produce RTL. IP suppliers do ensure correct functional behavior. Often overlooked in this process is the communication of design intent and implementation feasibility, a task left for the IP consumer to deal with. A poorly designed IP can result in failures at the SoC level with timing, routing congestion, power, clock synchronization, test coverage, etc. Typically these issues will not be uncovered until after a significant engineering effort has been spent on integration of the IP into the SoC and subsequent implementation. The net result is expensive design iterations, project delays and potential silicon failure.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
|
||||||
Related Articles
- Semiconductor Reliability and Quality Assurance--Failure Mode, Mechanism and Analysis (FMMEA)
- Application Specific IP - Ensuring Semiconductor IP Quality
- Semiconductor IP Quality - A User guide
- How to Save Time and Improve Communication Between Semiconductor Design and Verification Engineers
- Optimizing Automated Test Equipment for Quality and Complexity
New Articles
- Why RISC-V is a viable option for safety-critical applications
- Dimensioning in 3D space: Object Volumetric Measurement by Leveraging Depth Camera-based Reconstruction on NVIDIA Edge devices
- What is JESD204B? Quick summary of the standard
- Post-Quantum Cryptography - Securing Semiconductors in a Post-Quantum World
- Analysis and Summary on Clock Generator Circuits and PLL Design
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- Method for Booting ARM Based Multi-Core SoCs
- An Outline of the Semiconductor Chip Design Flow