Power-aware FPGA design (Part 3)
pldesignline.com (February 17, 2009)
This three-part article covers several aspects of FPGA power consumption; it also provides a new look at power dissipation numbers, and questions the traditional methods of estimating and measuring power.
Part 1
– Abstract
– Introduction
– FPGA Power Components and System Profile
– Fighting Static Power
– Fighting Dynamic Power
Part 2
– Fighting Dynamic Power (continued)
Part 3
– Fighting Dynamic Power (continued)
– Proposed Power Reduction Methodology
– Conclusions
– References
Fighting logic and nets' dynamic power
Several papers have been dedicated to this subject alone [BASZ2000, Belhadj 2002]. Due to lack of space, the focus of the following sections will be dedicated only to a power profiling of some arithmetic DesignWare elements, and a brief discussion of techniques to eliminate or reduce the propagation of unnecessary glitches.
Power-aware synthesis options/constraints setting
Because of the pressure to meet timing requirements, many FPGA designers do give much attention to the synthesis process and use stringent global timing constraints. This usually leads to larger utilization of the FPGA logic elements and the associated routing resources.
Logic resources could be reduced by studying the slack distribution for each clock domain, which is the number of paths violating the required timing specification and the overall severity of these violations. For the blocks that have relaxed timing or sufficient margin in all internal paths, careful area-oriented synthesis will lead to a sizeable reduction of the needed logic resources and thus lower power dissipation for these blocks. The caveat is the need to analyze the result of the area-oriented mapping by performing a timing analysis and being alert for glitch propagation paths due to an artificially higher number of logic levels.
To summarize, setting synthesis options and constraints should be the focus, applied appropriately to timing-critical blocks or sub-blocks. Analysis of slack distribution and avoidance of global synthesis settings are keys to improving logic dynamic power dissipation.
14. Slack distribution analysis and synthesis goals setting.
(Click this image to view a larger, more detailed version)
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Microsemi Hot IP
Related Articles
- Power-aware FPGA design (Part 2)
- Power-aware FPGA design (Part 1)
- Specifying a PLL Part 3: Jitter Budgeting for Synthesis
- Dealing with automotive software complexity with virtual prototyping - Part 3: Embedded software testing
- Optimizing embedded software for power efficiency: Part 3 - Optimizing data flow and memory
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)