Down & dirty with HW/SW co-design: Part 4 – Multi-objective optimization
Wayne Wolf
EETimes (6/21/2011 10:36 PM EDT)
Embedded system designs must meet several different design criteria. The traditional operations research approach of defining a single objective function and perhaps some minor objective functions, along with design constraints, may not adequately describe the system requirements.
Economist Vilfredo Pareto developed a theory for multi-objective analysis known as Pareto optimality. An important concept provided by this theory is the way in which optimal solutions are judged: an optimal solution cannot be improved without making some other part of the solution worse.
![]() |
E-mail This Article | ![]() |
![]() |
Printer-Friendly Page |
Related Articles
- Down & dirty with HW/SW co-design: Part 3 - Cosynthesis of multiprocessors
- Optimizing embedded software for power efficiency: Part 4 - Peripheral and algorithmic optimization
- HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 3 - Hardware-centric methods
- HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 2 - Software-centric methods
- HW/SW co-verification basics: Part 1 - Determining what & how to verify
New Articles
- Understanding MACsec and Its Integration
- Discover new Tessent UltraSight-V from Siemens EDA, and accelerate your RISC-V development.
- The Critical Factors of a High-performance Audio Codec - What Chip Designers Need to Know
- Density Management in Analog Layout Design: Addressing Issues and Ensuring Consistency
- Nexus: A Lightweight and Scalable Multi-Agent Framework for Complex Tasks Automation
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- Synthesis Methodology & Netlist Qualification
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)