Hierarchical methods for power intent specification
Luke Lang, Cadence Design Systems
EETimes (4/30/2012 9:48 AM EDT)
The intent of this design article is to provide a comprehensive tutorial on both the value of and the “how to” in using a hierarchical low-power design methodology. The article first shows how to express power intent top-down in a hierarchical design, which allows the designer to set rules abstractly without worrying about the details of all the power domain crossings lower in the design hierarchy. The article then describes the concept of macro modeling to capture power intent for IP blocks. Next, it illustrates a bottom-up hierarchical approach that enables the designer to integrate the same block in multiple situations that require different uses of the block’s internal power intent capabilities. Finally, the article describes how to use virtual ports and virtual power domains to simplify specification of rules for design objects that will later appear lower in the hierarchy, as the design implementation is refined.
Although the Common Power Format (CPF) is used as the main format to illustrate these capabilities, not all of these hierarchical capabilities are truly unique to CPF. The hierarchy support currently provided in the IEEE 1801 standard, Unified Power Format (UPF) 2.0, is also covered. The article concludes by reviewing recent developments toward methodology convergence between the Silicon Integration Initiative Low Power Coalition, which is responsible for CPF, and IEEE P1801.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Cadence Hot IP
Related Articles
- Shift Power Reduction Methods and Effectiveness for Testability in ASIC
- Methods to Fine-Tune Power Consumption of PCIe devices
- Power Intent Formats: Light at the End of the Tunnel?
- Formal Methods to Verify the Power Manager for an Embedded Multiprocessor Cluster
- Upfront Analysis of Low Power Specification, Assertions and Testbench to Enable Reuse
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)