NVM OTP NeoBit in Maxchip (180nm, 160nm, 150nm, 110nm, 90nm, 80nm)
Pinning down the acceptable level of jitter for your embedded design
Dean Smith, Integrated Device Technology
embedded.com (August 26, 2014)
There are several clock jitter types, measurement methodologies, and corresponding specifications. But most hardware designers don’t have the time to research these, and the detailed nuances of clock jitter specifications can seem like trivial minutia to the board designer.
The designer is often more focused on the larger design task(s) at hand. Taking precedence are design tasks specific to FPGA logic, microprocessor complex, data plane switch fabric, control plane switch fabric, RF signal chain, power, interconnectivity issues, design simulation, modeling, etc.
So, the designer must assume that the reference clock jitter specifications from the various chip vendors are relevant for their intended use of these devices, and that they are also specified completely and correctly.
But without some basic guidelines to follow, the designer could over-specify the clock jitter requirements and add undue bill of material (BOM) cost to the design with more expensive clocks devices. Or, even worse, the clock jitter requirements could be under-specified and corresponding errors will increase beyond an acceptable error rate for the given application. This may not be determined until after performance metric testing of initial prototype boards very late in the development cycle, potentially impacting end product release schedules.
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |
|
Related Articles
- Supply Noise Induced Jitter - Don't Let it Kill your Chip
- When Your Embedded Processor Runs Out of Steam, Try Parallelism
- Migrating your embedded PCB design from DDR2/3 to DDR4 SDRAMs
- Building eye-catching GUIs for your embedded MCU designs
- Is a single-chip SOC processor right for your embedded project?
New Articles
- Quantum Readiness Considerations for Suppliers and Manufacturers
- A Rad Hard ASIC Design Approach: Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR)
- Early Interactive Short Isolation for Faster SoC Verification
- The Ideal Crypto Coprocessor with Root of Trust to Support Customer Complete Full Chip Evaluation: PUFcc gained SESIP and PSA Certified™ Level 3 RoT Component Certification
- Advanced Packaging and Chiplets Can Be for Everyone
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- UPF Constraint coding for SoC - A Case Study
- Dynamic Memory Allocation and Fragmentation in C and C++
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)