English
IC design: A short primer on the formal methods-based verification
by Ashish Darbari, Axiomise
It’s no secret that hardware is the new currency in the chip world. It’s no longer the case that the semiconductor industry is in the hands of traditional semiconductor giants; an increasing number of software companies now have their own dedicated hardware development teams. With the advent of open-source architectures, developing silicon with open-source framework and tools is slowly becoming mainstream.
However, while designing has become easier, verification has not.
The 2020 Wilson Research Group study on functional verification points out that 83% of the FPGA and 68% of the ASIC designs fail in the first attempt. Also worth noting is that 68% of the ASIC projects run behind schedule.
The survey reports that for processor development, the ratio of verification to design engineers is 5:1. Imagine having to hire five times more verification resources than design and having to respin the chip.
|
E-mail This Article | 
|
|
Printer-Friendly Page |
|
||||||
Related Articles
- A Formal Methods-based verification approach to medical device software analysis
- Why verification matters in network-on-chip (NoC) design
- A closer look at security verification for RISC-V processors
- A short primer on instruction set architecture
- It's Not My Fault! How to Run a Better Fault Campaign Using Formal
New Articles
Most Popular
- System Verilog Assertions Simplified
- System Verilog Macro: A Powerful Feature for Design Verification Projects
- Enhancing VLSI Design Efficiency: Tackling Congestion and Shorts with Practical Approaches and PnR Tool (ICC2)
- Synthesis Methodology & Netlist Qualification
- Streamlining SoC Design with IDS-Integrate™