Adaptive-computing chip could enable software-defined radio
Adaptive-computing chip could enable software-defined radio
By Stephan Ohr, EE Times
April 29, 2002 (3:26 p.m. EST)
URL: http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020429S0016
SAN FRANCISCOQuickSilver Technology Inc. will announce this week an adaptive-computing machine that enables development of algorithm processors for a new-generation of multiband cellular radios. If the test chip lives up to its billing it could move highly touted software-defined radio a large step closer to reality.
An adaptive-computing machine, or ACM, can perform a number of cellular handset functions with higher performance at a fraction of the overhead of a general-purpose DSP, said Paul Master, QuickSilver's chief technology officer. The test chip being unveiled this week, he said, is particularly adept at processing key third-generation (3G) wireless standards, cdma2000 and wideband CDMA. A software-defined radio one that could implement GSM and Edge as well as CDMA cellular functions could be built with one of these, Master said.
In a demonstration for EE Times, four test chips showed that the ACM cou ld rapidly acquire cdma2000 basestation channels (a "searcher" function) and select the strongest from among several optimum choices via a "rake finger" function, one that finds the channel with the lowest bit-error rate.
The searcher function requires a 512-point complex fast Fourier transform, examining 215 possible phase points. It ordinarily takes 3.4 seconds on a general-purpose DSP, Master said. A 25-MHz board with four ACMs takes a little more than 1 second. A 16-ACM board running at 100 MHz would take about 0.06 seconds, he projected. Unlike a cell phone DSP, which could use software to exercise only part of its hardware to perform the initial search, the ACM could use all its hardware to run the task in a fraction of the time, then reconfigure itself to take on the next task.
'Very powerful concept'
"Reconfigurable computing definitely has a place in wireless apps," said Jeff Bier, president of Berkeley Design Technology Inc., a DSP architecture authority who has b een anxious to study QuickSilver's thus-far mysterious architecture. "It's a very powerful concept being able to rejigger the hardware, to 'morph it' so it can address each operation separately. But it's a very complicated thing to harness. Maybe QuickSilver has solved the problem."
The introduction will open the lid on the San Jose, Calif. company's contribution to reconfigurable computing, a technology that claims higher performance and power efficiency than general-purpose DSPs and microprocessors and greater flexibility than hardwired ASICs.
A general-purpose processor like the Pentium relies on extensive instruction-acquisition and address-generation machinery. As a result it cannot be as efficient as a vector processor, which executes a single instruction over and over. Even with a 500-MHz clock, the overall efficiency (measured by the proportion of its 10 million switches actually in use during an operation) is as low as 10 percent, Master said. With each Pentium generation, th e number of transistors and the clock speed go up but the efficiency goes down, he said. A 100 million-transistor device clocked at 5 GHz might use less than 5 percent of the switches; a billion-transistor Pentium clocked at 20 GHz will likely be only 1 percent efficient in its use of silicon and power. To the extent that software-defined radio must rely on general-purpose processors and DSPs, authorities like Bob Brodersen of the University of California's Berkeley Wireless Technology Research Center have declared it a bogus goal.
FPGA makers have discovered that hardwired logic performs many communications functions faster and more efficiently than general-purpose DSPs. But Master said FPGA architectures process some communications algorithms well but not others. "If the architecture lends itself to what you're doing, great. But if it doesn't, you'll pay a 100x silicon penalty trying to shape the device to the force-fit function," he said.
QuickSilver's ACM can change its hardware architect ure on demand cycle by cycle, if necessary to fit a specific algorithm processing function. Compared with a general-purpose processor, which gets about 5 percent computational power efficiency (CPE), or a hardwired ASIC, which gets 20 to 30 percent, an ACM has 50 to 70 percent CPE, QuickSilver said.
Related News
- IMEC software-defined radio concept compliant with 3GPP-LTE
- Xilinx And ISR Technologies Demonstrate World's First Software-Defined Radio Using Partial Reconfiguration of FPGAs
- BrainChip and Lorser Industries to Develop Neuromorphic Computing Systems for Software-Defined Radio Devices
- Software-defined 802.16e radios offer agile development platform for next-generation mobile wireless
- Pulselink rolls software-defined UWB platform; faces ITU resistance
Breaking News
- Frontgrade Gaisler Unveils GR716B, a New Standard in Space-Grade Microcontrollers
- Blueshift Memory launches BlueFive processor, accelerating computation by up to 50 times and saving up to 65% energy
- Eliyan Ports Industry's Highest Performing PHY to Samsung Foundry SF4X Process Node, Achieving up to 40 Gbps Bandwidth at Unprecedented Power Levels with UCIe-Compliant Chiplet Interconnect Technology
- CXL Fabless Startup Panmnesia Secures Over $60M in Series A Funding, Aiming to Lead the CXL Switch Silicon Chip and CXL IP
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
Most Popular
- Cadence Unveils Arm-Based System Chiplet
- CXL Fabless Startup Panmnesia Secures Over $60M in Series A Funding, Aiming to Lead the CXL Switch Silicon Chip and CXL IP
- Esperanto Technologies and NEC Cooperate on Initiative to Advance Next Generation RISC-V Chips and Software Solutions for HPC
- Eliyan Ports Industry's Highest Performing PHY to Samsung Foundry SF4X Process Node, Achieving up to 40 Gbps Bandwidth at Unprecedented Power Levels with UCIe-Compliant Chiplet Interconnect Technology
- Arteris Selected by GigaDevice for Development in Next-Generation Automotive SoC With Enhanced FuSa Standards
E-mail This Article | Printer-Friendly Page |